Published on 22 June 2026
3 mins’ read time

Safely implementing ATEX requirements in production and in the warehouse

Solvent-based adhesives, paints, thinners and cleaning agents pose particular challenges for explosion protection. We explain how operators assess substances and applications, classify explosion hazard zones and avoid typical vulnerabilities.

Key points at a glance

  • Whether an explosive atmosphere forms depends primarily on the flash point of the substances used.
  • The method used also affects the risk: handling the substance in the open, using syringes or heated solvents all increase it.
  • In designated hazardous areas, all components must have ATEX approval.

In traditional manufacturing plants, solvent-based adhesives, paints, thinners and cleaning agents are used on a daily basis. As some of these substances are flammable, this gives rise to specific requirements regarding fire and explosion protection. Operators are tasked with systematically assessing potential hazards and defining appropriate protective measures.

The basis for this is provided by the European ATEX regulations (Atmosphères Explosibles). These set out requirements for equipment, protective systems and work areas where explosive atmospheres may occur. In practice, this concerns both the assessment of potentially explosive areas and their classification into Ex zones, as well as the selection of suitable equipment.

Assessing fabric properties correctly

Whether an explosive atmosphere can form when handling solvents depends largely on the properties of the substances used. The most important assessment parameters include:

  • Flash point
  • boiling point
  • Vapour pressure

The flash point is particularly relevant; this can be found in the safety data sheet. If it is not sufficiently higher than the ambient temperature (usually at least 15°C), the formation of hazardous explosive atmospheres must be anticipated. It should also be borne in mind that solvent vapours are heavier than air and can therefore spread close to the floor – for example, in storage rooms.

The use of the product affects the risk

In addition to the properties of the substance, the way in which solvents are handled plays a crucial role. Factors that influence the potential risk include, amongst others:

  • open and closed systems for handling solvents
  • application methods used, such as spraying, brushing or dipping
  • Heating of the solvent, for example in hot-spray applications or cleaning agents

Guidance on the DGUV regulations

Various DGUV information documents and regulations provide guidance on the correct design of workstations and the classification of explosion-protected zones, including:

ApplicationSet of rulesTitle
When applying wet paintDGUV Information 209-046Processing of liquid coating materials – fire and explosion protection
For cleaning systemsDGUV Information 209-088Cleaning workpieces with cleaning fluids
GeneralDGUV Rule 113-001A collection of examples illustrating the classification of potentially explosive atmospheres into zones in accordance with TRGS 711

Where areas at risk of explosion are identified, the components used there must have the appropriate ATEX approval to ensure that they cannot act as a source of ignition.

Typical vulnerabilities encountered in practice

In practice, ATEX-relevant equipment frequently exhibits similar technical and organisational shortcomings, for example:

  • The cross-sectional area of the earthing conductor is too small
  • flexible hoses damaged by vibration
  • missing conductive bridges on seals or extraction hoses
  • unsuitable terminals for making contact
  • incomplete technical documentation

Such vulnerabilities can not only compromise plant safety, but also frequently lead to findings during inspections.

Is your next Ex exam coming up?

We carry out a preliminary check of your ATEX equipment and identify any typical faults before the inspector does.

Making sensible use of technical safeguards

The so-called ‘economy humidifier’ is an example of a safety measure for handling solvents. It releases only a controlled amount of solvent, whilst the container otherwise remains tightly sealed. The economy humidifier is one of the measures recommended in various DGUV and BG regulations.

A systematic approach in the workplace

To ensure the safe handling of solvents, a systematic approach is recommended within the workplace:

  1. Compile an overview of all substances used – in tabular form, including flash point, GHS pictogram and H-phrase
  2. Determine the location and conditions of use of the substances
  3. Carry out a technical assessment on site – it is advisable to do this with an occupational safety specialist or an explosion protection expert in order to reliably identify any vulnerabilities
  4. Divide into Ex zones where necessary
  5. Carry out inspections and rectify defects
  6. Monitor and document inspection intervals
  7. Check regulations regularly to ensure they are up to date

Take explosion protection into account at an early stage

The safe handling of solvents requires a combination of knowledge of the substances involved, process engineering assessment and regular inspection of the equipment used. QUBUS is here to support you in reliably identifying vulnerabilities and implementing solutions to further reduce the risk of explosions.

Contents

Frank Schüle

Frank Schüle

Graduate Engineer (FH) Head of the Environment, Health and Safety / Fire Safety Department

+49 7171 10408-17 schuele@qubus.de

Is explosion protection in the workplace under scrutiny?

We assess your substances and workstations, identify weaknesses in ATEX equipment and show you how to further reduce the risk of explosions.

Relevant services

We assess your current situation, identify areas where action is needed and support you through the implementation process.

Discover the latest posts

You can also receive new articles and industry-related information conveniently by email.
© 2026 QUBUS Planning and Consultancy for Surface Technology
crossarrow-right