
Key points at a glance
Requirements, fundamentals and practical guidance: Understanding the implications for industrial coating companies.
The AwSV (“Ordinance on Installations for the Handling of Substances Hazardous to Water”) has been in force nationwide since 2017 and replaces the previously state-specific VAwS regulations. It follows the precautionary principle set out in Section 62 of the Water Act (WHG): facilities must be designed in such a way that they cannot adversely affect water bodies.
The de minimis threshold for installations subject to the AwSV is 0.22 m³. Individual small installations (e.g. with a single 200-litre drum of stock) do not fall within the scope of the AwSV. This also applies, for example, to machine tools filled individually with cooling lubricants or oils up to this volume.
This requirement applies to all facilities handling substances that pose a risk to water – including HBV facilities (e.g. electroplating or anodising plants) and LAU facilities (e.g. chemical storage facilities or tank farms).
The documentation requirement under Section 43 of the AwSV applies to all AwSV installations in which water-polluting substances are handled, regardless of whether they are subject to inspection or not.
AwSV documentation is crucial for safety, legal compliance and environmental protection. Missing or incomplete documentation can result in fines, shutdowns or liability risks.
Drawing on our team of experts’ many years of experience and comprehensive expertise, we ensure that your plant documentation complies with all legal standards under the AwSV. In our newsletter, we keep you informed of any relevant changes to the law.
Complete AwSV plant documentation comprises:
We will cross-check your asset register against the existing documentation and provide any missing information required by the authorities.
Whilst the VAwS used to vary from one federal state to another, the AwSV has, since 2017, regulated the handling of substances hazardous to water in a centralised and uniform manner. Older documents may still be relevant, but are no longer legally valid.
Practical example
At a medium-sized company, we were able to reduce a list of hazardous substances comprising around 1,300 substances to 450 relevant entries – without any loss of information.
The result: legally compliant, clearly structured and practical documentation that not only meets statutory requirements but also significantly simplifies the internal handling of hazardous substances.
Synergies with the secure bath management system created additional value, enabling processes to be made more efficient and transparent.
Frank Schüle
Graduate Engineer (FH) Head of the Environment, Health and Safety / Fire Safety Department